Claude 4 Opus vs Llama 4 Maverick
Deprecated proprietary flagship vs open source MIT challenger — 98% cheaper, 5x more context. The ultimate Claude 4 Opus migration comparison.
Pricing data verified: Jun 9, 2026
| Specification | Claude 4 Opus | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $15.00 | $0.27 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $75.00 | $0.85 |
| Context Window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Tier | Premium | Budget |
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta (Together.ai) |
| License | Proprietary | MIT (open source) |
| Self-Hostable | No | Yes |
| Status | Deprecated Jun 15 | Active |
| Cost at 1M input + 500K output | $52.50 | $0.70 |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
Enter your usage to see how much you save by migrating from Claude 4 Opus to Llama 4 Maverick.
Which Model for Which Use Case?
Claude 4 Opus Migration
With Claude 4 Opus deprecating June 15, Llama 4 Maverick offers the most dramatic cost reduction — 98% cheaper with 5x more context. The MIT license means zero vendor lock-in.
Self-Hosting & Data Privacy
Llama 4 Maverick's MIT license lets you self-host on your own infrastructure. No data leaves your servers. Ideal for healthcare, finance, or regulated industries that can't use third-party APIs.
Complex Reasoning (Direct Replacement)
If you need Opus-level reasoning quality, Claude Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) is the direct successor — 67% cheaper than Claude 4 Opus with 5x more context. Llama 4 Maverick is better for standard workloads.
High-Volume Production
At scale, Llama 4 Maverick's $0.27/$0.85 pricing makes it viable for high-volume applications where Claude 4 Opus's $15/$75 was cost-prohibitive. Process 100x more data for the same budget.
Need deeper cost analysis?
APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick cheaper than Claude 4 Opus?
Yes, dramatically. Claude 4 Opus costs $15/M input and $75/M output. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.27/M input and $0.85/M output via Together.ai. Llama 4 Maverick is 98% cheaper on input and 99% cheaper on output. For a typical workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.70 vs Claude 4 Opus's $52.50 — saving you $51.80/month (99%).
How does Llama 4 Maverick quality compare to Claude 4 Opus?
Claude 4 Opus was Anthropic's flagship model with excellent reasoning and coding capabilities, but it's being deprecated on June 15, 2026. Llama 4 Maverick from Meta is an open source model with a 1M token context window — 5x larger than Claude 4 Opus's 200K. Maverick excels at general tasks and is available via Together.ai or self-hosted. For complex reasoning that previously required Opus, consider Claude Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) or GPT-5.5 ($5/$30) as direct replacements.
What happens when Claude 4 Opus deprecates on June 15?
After June 15, 2026, Claude 4 Opus API calls will fail with errors. You must migrate to a replacement model. Options: (1) Claude Opus 4.8 ($5/$25) — direct Anthropic successor, 67% cheaper with 5x more context. (2) Llama 4 Maverick ($0.27/$0.85) — 98% cheaper, open source, 1M context. (3) GPT-5.5 ($5/$30) — OpenAI flagship. (4) DeepSeek V4 Pro ($0.44/$0.87) — budget open source with 1M context.
Can I self-host Llama 4 Maverick instead of using an API?
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick is released under the MIT license, so you can self-host it on your own infrastructure. For API access without managing servers, use Together.ai ($0.27/$0.85), Fireworks, or other hosting providers. Self-hosting eliminates API costs but requires significant GPU resources (multiple A100/H100 GPUs). For most developers, the hosted API at $0.27/$0.85 per 1M tokens is more cost-effective than self-hosting.