Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Llama 4 Maverick
Llama 4 Maverick is 87% cheaper on input ($0.27 vs $2.00) and 93% cheaper on output ($0.85 vs $12.00). Both offer 1M token context windows.
Pricing data verified: 2026-06-21
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google) | Llama 4 Maverick (Meta/Together.ai) |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.27 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $12.00 | $0.85 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M |
| Tier | Mid | Budget |
| Provider | Meta (Together.ai) |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
See how the costs stack up for your specific usage pattern.
Other Models to Consider
Which Model for Which Use Case?
Cost-Sensitive Startups
Llama 4 Maverick is 87-93% cheaper across the board. At 10,000 requests/day with 1K input and 500 output tokens, you save ~$7,305/month vs Gemini 3.1 Pro. For startups watching every dollar, Llama is the clear winner.
Multimodal & Google Ecosystem
Gemini 3.1 Pro supports images, video, and audio natively, plus deep integration with Google Cloud, Workspace, and BigQuery. Llama 4 Maverick is text-focused. If your app needs multimodal understanding or Google integration, Gemini is the better choice.
Self-Hosting & Open Source
Llama 4 Maverick is open-source (MIT license) and can be self-hosted on your own GPU infrastructure. This eliminates API costs entirely for high-volume workloads. Gemini 3.1 Pro is API-only with no self-hosting option.
Text-Heavy Workloads at Scale
For classification, extraction, summarization, RAG pipelines, and other text tasks at scale, Llama 4 Maverick's 93% output savings make it the clear winner. Quality is excellent for most production text workloads.
Need the Full Comparison?
APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 42 models, find the cheapest option for your exact usage, and save scenarios for your team.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick really that much cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.27/M input (87% cheaper) and $0.85/M output (93% cheaper). For 1M input + 500K output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Pro costs ~$8,000 vs Llama 4 Maverick ~$695 — saving ~$7,305 (91%).
What's the quality difference between Gemini 3.1 Pro and Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemini 3.1 Pro generally outperforms Llama 4 Maverick on complex reasoning, multimodal tasks, and benchmarks requiring deep analysis. Llama 4 Maverick is excellent for most text-based workloads and offers strong quality for its price point.
When should I choose Gemini 3.1 Pro over Llama 4 Maverick?
Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro when you need Google ecosystem integration, multimodal capabilities (images, video, audio), or stronger performance on complex reasoning tasks. Gemini's enterprise support and SLAs may also justify the premium.
Can I self-host Llama 4 Maverick to save even more?
Yes. Llama 4 Maverick is open-source (MIT license) and can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure. This eliminates API costs entirely, though you'll need to account for GPU compute costs. Self-hosting is ideal for high-volume workloads where API costs would be substantial.
Which model is better for multimodal tasks?
Gemini 3.1 Pro is significantly better for multimodal tasks. It natively supports images, video, and audio input with strong performance across modalities. Llama 4 Maverick is primarily a text model and lacks Gemini's multimodal capabilities.