GPT-oss 120B vs Llama 4 Scout
OpenAI's open-weight model vs Meta's Llama 4 — both under $1/M tokens, but Llama offers 8x more context.
Pricing data verified: Jun 9, 2026
| Specification | GPT-oss 120B | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Input Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.18 |
| Output Price (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $0.59 |
| Context Window | 128K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Tier | Budget | Budget |
| Provider | OpenAI | Meta / Together.ai |
| Input Savings | 17% cheaper | — |
| Context Advantage | — | 8x more context |
| License | Open-weight | Llama Community License |
| Cost at 1M input + 500K output | $0.45 | $0.475 |
Calculate Your Exact Costs
Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison for both models.
Which Model for Which Use Case?
Budget High-Volume
Both models are budget champions under $1/M tokens. GPT-oss is slightly cheaper on input (17% savings), while Llama is marginally cheaper on output. At massive scale, GPT-oss's input savings add up.
Long Context on a Budget
Llama 4 Scout's 1M context window at budget pricing is unmatched. Process entire codebases, long documents, or massive RAG contexts without breaking the bank. GPT-oss is limited to 128K.
Self-Hosting & Custom Fine-Tuning
Both models support self-hosting. Llama 4 Scout benefits from Meta's extensive fine-tuning ecosystem and community tools. GPT-oss brings OpenAI's architecture to self-hosted deployments.
Enterprise & Compliance
OpenAI's GPT-oss benefits from established enterprise relationships and compliance certifications. Llama 4 Scout's Meta backing provides reliability but with different licensing terms for large companies.
Need deeper cost analysis?
APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do GPT-oss 120B and Llama 4 Scout compare on pricing?
GPT-oss 120B costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output. GPT-oss is 17% cheaper on input, while Llama is marginally cheaper (2%) on output. For a workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens, GPT-oss costs $0.45 vs Llama's $0.475 — a negligible $0.025 difference. The real differentiator is Llama's 8x larger context window.
What is the context window difference between GPT-oss 120B and Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout offers a 1M token context window while GPT-oss 120B supports 128K tokens. That means Llama has 8x more context capacity. For tasks like long document analysis, RAG pipelines, or code review of large codebases, Llama 4 Scout's 1M context is a significant advantage at virtually the same price.
How do GPT-oss and Llama 4 Scout differ in open-source licensing?
Both are open-weight models available for self-hosting. Llama 4 Scout uses Meta's community license which permits commercial use but has restrictions for companies with over 700M monthly active users. GPT-oss 120B is OpenAI's first open-weight release with weights available for download. For API usage through providers (Together.ai for Llama, OpenAI for GPT-oss), licensing differences are less relevant — you're paying per token.
When should I choose Llama 4 Scout over GPT-oss 120B?
Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) you need the 1M context window for long documents or RAG, (2) you want self-hosting flexibility with Meta's ecosystem, (3) you need strong multilingual support. Choose GPT-oss 120B when: (1) you want OpenAI's model architecture and fine-tuning tools, (2) your tasks fit within 128K context, (3) you prefer the OpenAI API ecosystem for consistency with other GPT models.