GPT-5 vs Llama 4 Scout

OpenAI vs Meta — Llama 4 Scout is 86% cheaper on input and 94% cheaper on output, with 3.7x more context.

Pricing data verified: Jun 10, 2026

SpecificationGPT-5Llama 4 Scout
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$1.25$0.18
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.59
Context Window272K tokens1M tokens
TierFlagshipBudget
ProviderOpenAIMeta (Together.ai)
Input SavingsBaseline86% cheaper
Output SavingsBaseline94% cheaper
Cost at 1M input + 500K output$6.25$0.47

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison for both models.

OpenAI
GPT-5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Meta (Together.ai)
Llama 4 Scout
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Cost Optimization

Llama 4 Scout at $0.18/M input is 86% cheaper than GPT-5. For startups watching every dollar, Llama 4 Scout delivers flagship-quality results at budget pricing.

Best value: Llama 4 Scout (86-94% cheaper)

Enterprise Reliability

GPT-5 comes with OpenAI's managed infrastructure, SLAs, and enterprise support. If uptime guarantees and dedicated support matter, GPT-5 is the safer choice.

Enterprise: GPT-5 | Budget: Llama 4 Scout

Open-Source Flexibility

Llama 4 Scout is fully open-source — you can self-host, fine-tune, and customize without vendor lock-in. GPT-5 is proprietary with API-only access.

Flexibility: Llama 4 Scout | Managed: GPT-5

Long-Context on a Budget

Llama 4 Scout offers 1M context at $0.18/M input — 3.7x more context than GPT-5 at 86% lower cost. For long-context workloads on a budget, it's unbeatable.

Long context + budget: Llama 4 Scout

Need deeper cost analysis?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.

39 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than GPT-5?

Yes. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output. Llama is 86% cheaper on input and 94% cheaper on output. For 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama costs $0.48 vs GPT-5's $6.25 — saving $5.77/month (92%).

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout has a 1M token context window, which is 3.7x larger than GPT-5's 272K context. For long-context workloads, Llama 4 Scout offers more room at a fraction of the cost.

When should I choose GPT-5 over Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5 when: (1) you need OpenAI's managed infrastructure and support, (2) you want guaranteed uptime SLAs, (3) your workload requires the highest quality reasoning. Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) cost is the primary concern (86-94% cheaper), (2) you can self-host or use Together.ai, (3) you want open-source flexibility.

Are GPT-5 and Llama 4 Scout good for production use?

Both support production workloads. GPT-5 is OpenAI's flagship with enterprise support. Llama 4 Scout is Meta's open-source model available via Together.ai — significantly cheaper but you manage your own deployment or rely on Together.ai's infrastructure.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5 mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Budget vs Budget open-source
GPT-5 vs Claude vs Gemini
Three-way flagship comparison
GPT-5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI vs Anthropic
Share on X LinkedIn