GPT-5.5 vs Llama 4 Scout

OpenAI vs Meta — Llama 4 Scout is 96% cheaper on input and 98% cheaper on output, with a comparable 1M context window.

Pricing data verified: Jun 10, 2026

SpecificationGPT-5.5Llama 4 Scout
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.18
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$30.00$0.59
Context Window1.05M tokens1M tokens
TierPremiumBudget
ProviderOpenAIMeta (Together.ai)
Input SavingsBaseline96% cheaper
Output SavingsBaseline98% cheaper
Cost at 1M input + 500K output$20.00$0.47

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison for both models.

OpenAI
GPT-5.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Meta (Together.ai)
Llama 4 Scout
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Extreme Cost Optimization

Llama 4 Scout at $0.18/M is 96% cheaper than GPT-5.5. For high-volume applications where cost per token is critical, Llama 4 Scout delivers massive savings.

Best value: Llama 4 Scout (96-98% cheaper)

Maximum Quality

GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's most capable model, offering the highest quality reasoning and generation. For applications where output quality is paramount, GPT-5.5 justifies its premium.

Quality: GPT-5.5 | Budget: Llama 4 Scout

Open-Source at Scale

Llama 4 Scout gives you full open-source control — self-host, fine-tune, and customize. At $0.18/M input, you can run massive workloads for a fraction of GPT-5.5's cost.

Open-source scale: Llama 4 Scout

Enterprise vs Startup

GPT-5.5 suits enterprises needing managed infrastructure and support. Llama 4 Scout suits startups and cost-conscious teams who can manage their own deployment.

Enterprise: GPT-5.5 | Startup: Llama 4 Scout

Need deeper cost analysis?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.

39 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Yes. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.18/M input and $0.59/M output. GPT-5.5 costs $5.00/M input and $30.00/M output. Llama is 96% cheaper on input and 98% cheaper on output. For 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Llama costs $0.48 vs GPT-5.5's $20.00 — saving $19.52/month (98%).

Which has a larger context window?

GPT-5.5 has a 1.05M token context window, which is slightly larger than Llama 4 Scout's 1M context. The difference is minimal — both handle very long contexts.

When should I choose GPT-5.5 over Llama 4 Scout?

Choose GPT-5.5 when: (1) you need OpenAI's premium quality and ecosystem, (2) you want managed infrastructure with SLAs, (3) your workload requires the absolute highest reasoning capability. Choose Llama 4 Scout when: (1) cost is the primary concern (96-98% cheaper), (2) you can self-host or use Together.ai, (3) you want open-source flexibility.

Are both models production-ready?

Both support production workloads. GPT-5.5 is OpenAI's most capable model with enterprise support. Llama 4 Scout is Meta's open-source model via Together.ai — dramatically cheaper but requires more infrastructure consideration.

Related Comparisons

GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
OpenAI vs DeepSeek
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI vs Anthropic
GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAI vs Google
Share on X LinkedIn