Premium Tier Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5

The two most powerful premium AI models. Compare pricing, context windows, and find the best value for your demanding workloads.

Pricing data verified: Jun 8, 2026

Specification Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)
Input Price (per 1M tokens) $5.00 $5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens) $25.00 $30.00
Context Window 1M tokens 1.05M tokens
Tier Premium Premium
Provider Anthropic OpenAI
Output Savings vs Other 17% cheaper output 5% more context

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Premium tier — for when only the most capable model will do.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
OpenAI
GPT-5.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Premium Models

Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic
$5 / $25 per 1M
1M context
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI
$30 / $180 per 1M
1.05M context
GPT-5
OpenAI
$1.25 / $10 per 1M
272K context

Which Premium Model for Which Use Case?

Deep Research & Analysis

Complex multi-step reasoning, research synthesis, and nuanced analysis. Both are exceptional. Opus 4.8 is widely regarded as the strongest reasoning model available.

Better reasoning: Claude Opus 4.8

Long-Form Content

Novels, reports, documentation. Both handle 1M+ context. Opus 4.8's output pricing ($25/M vs $30/M) saves 17% on long outputs.

Better value: Claude Opus 4.8

Enterprise AI Applications

Production systems requiring maximum capability. Both are enterprise-ready. GPT-5.5 offers slightly more context (1.05M) and OpenAI's tool-use ecosystem.

OpenAI ecosystem: GPT-5.5 | Output savings: Opus 4.8

Code Generation

Complex code generation, architecture design, refactoring. Both are top-tier. Opus 4.8 excels at following complex instructions precisely.

Instruction following: Claude Opus 4.8

Building with premium models?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and find the cheapest option for your exact usage pattern.

39 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.8 cheaper than GPT-5.5?

Yes, on output tokens. Both models cost $5/M for input tokens, but Claude Opus 4.8 costs $25/M for output while GPT-5.5 costs $30/M — a 17% savings on output. For a typical workload of 1M input + 500K output tokens/month, Claude Opus 4.8 costs $17.50 vs GPT-5.5's $20.00.

Which has a larger context window?

GPT-5.5 has a slightly larger context window at 1.05M tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.8's 1M tokens. The difference is only 5%, so both models handle similarly large contexts. For most use cases, the context window is essentially equivalent.

When should I choose Claude Opus 4.8 over GPT-5.5?

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 when you need: (1) Maximum output quality for creative writing, analysis, or nuanced reasoning, (2) Lower output costs at scale ($25/M vs $30/M), (3) Tasks requiring careful instruction following. Choose GPT-5.5 when you need OpenAI ecosystem integration or slightly more context.

Can I use Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 together?

Yes. Many teams use both: Claude Opus 4.8 for complex reasoning, writing, and analysis tasks, and GPT-5.5 for tasks that benefit from OpenAI's tool use or when you need 1.05M context. A multi-model strategy lets you pick the best model per task.

Related Comparisons

Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium vs budget
GPT-5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Premium vs budget
Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Premium vs mid-tier
Share on X LinkedIn