Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5

Anthropic vs OpenAI — GPT-5 is 58% cheaper on input and 33% cheaper on output, but Sonnet 4.6 has 3.7x more context.

Pricing data verified: Jun 11, 2026

SpecificationClaude Sonnet 4.6GPT-5
Input Price (per 1M tokens)$3.00$1.25
Output Price (per 1M tokens)$15.00$10.00
Context Window1M tokens272K tokens
TierMidPremium
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Cost at 1M input + 500K output$10.50$6.25

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Enter your usage to see a precise cost comparison.

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
OpenAI
GPT-5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Which Model for Which Use Case?

Cost Optimization

GPT-5 at $1.25/M input is 58% cheaper than Sonnet 4.6. For high-volume workloads within 272K context, GPT-5 delivers significant savings.

Best value: GPT-5 (33-58% cheaper)

Long Context

Sonnet 4.6's 1M context window is 3.7x larger than GPT-5's 272K. For processing long documents, legal files, or codebases, Sonnet 4.6 is the clear winner.

Long docs: Sonnet 4.6 | Short context: GPT-5

Code Generation

Both models are strong at code generation. Sonnet 4.6 excels at complex refactoring with its larger context. GPT-5 offers better value for straightforward coding tasks.

Complex code: Sonnet 4.6 | Budget coding: GPT-5

Enterprise Workloads

Sonnet 4.6 offers Anthropic's safety-focused approach with 1M context for enterprise document processing. GPT-5 provides OpenAI's ecosystem with lower costs for standard workloads.

Enterprise docs: Sonnet 4.6 | Standard API: GPT-5

Need deeper cost analysis?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and export PDF reports.

39 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5 cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6?

Yes. GPT-5 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. GPT-5 is 58% cheaper on input and 33% cheaper on output. For 1M input + 500K output/month, GPT-5 costs $6.25 vs Sonnet's $10.50 — saving $4.25/month (40%).

Which has a larger context window?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1M token context window — 3.7x larger than GPT-5's 272K context. If you need to process long documents or maintain extensive conversation history, Sonnet 4.6 has a significant advantage.

When should I choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 over GPT-5?

Choose Sonnet 4.6 when: (1) you need long context (1M vs 272K), (2) you want Anthropic's safety-focused approach, (3) your workload involves large document processing. Choose GPT-5 when: (1) cost matters (33-58% cheaper), (2) your context fits within 272K, (3) you want OpenAI's ecosystem and tooling.

Are both models production-ready?

Both are production-ready. Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier model with 1M context and strong reasoning. GPT-5 is OpenAI's premium model offering excellent value at lower price points. Both handle enterprise workloads well.

Related Comparisons

Opus 4.8 vs Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic premium vs mid-tier
Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Premium vs Google mid-tier
GPT-5.5 vs Sonnet 4.6
OpenAI premium vs Anthropic mid
Share on X LinkedIn