Premium Tier Comparison

GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

The two most powerful premium AI models. Compare pricing, context windows, and find the best value for your high-stakes production workloads.

Pricing data verified: Jun 10, 2026

Specification GPT-5.5 (OpenAI) Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic)
Input Price (per 1M tokens) $5.00 $5.00
Output Price (per 1M tokens) $30.00 $25.00
Context Window 1.05M tokens 1M tokens
Tier Premium Premium
Provider OpenAI Anthropic
Input Savings vs Other Same price 17% cheaper output

Calculate Your Exact Costs

Premium tier — maximum capability for complex, high-value tasks.

OpenAI
GPT-5.5
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.8
$0.00
per month
Input cost
Output cost
Cost per request
Requests/month

Other Premium Models

GPT-5
OpenAI
$1.25 / $10 per 1M
272K context
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google
$2 / $12 per 1M
1M context
Grok 4.3
xAI
$2 / $10 per 1M
1M context

Which Premium Model for Which Use Case?

Complex Research Analysis

Deep research tasks requiring maximum reasoning capability. Both models are top-tier, but Opus 4.8 is 17% cheaper on output tokens.

Better value: Claude Opus 4.8

Ultra-Long Document Processing

Processing documents over 1M tokens — legal discovery, large codebases, research archives. GPT-5.5's 1.05M context gives a slight edge.

Slight edge: GPT-5.5

Enterprise AI Assistant

High-stakes enterprise deployments requiring maximum quality. Both models deliver premium results. Opus 4.8 saves 17% on output.

Better value: Claude Opus 4.8

Content Generation at Scale

Long-form content, marketing campaigns, product documentation. Both handle this well. Opus 4.8 at $5/$25 vs GPT-5.5 at $5/$30.

Better value: Claude Opus 4.8

Building on a budget?

APIpulse Pro lets you compare all 39 models, save scenarios, and find the cheapest option for your exact usage pattern.

39 models across 10 providers
Save up to 10 scenarios
Export PDF cost reports
Optimize — save up to 40%
Get Pro — $29 one-time

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5.5 more expensive than Claude Opus 4.8?

GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 have the same input price at $5/M tokens. However, GPT-5.5 is 20% more expensive on output at $30/M compared to Opus 4.8's $25/M. For output-heavy workloads, Opus 4.8 is the more cost-effective choice.

Which has a larger context window?

GPT-5.5 has a slightly larger context window at 1.05M tokens compared to Claude Opus 4.8's 1M tokens. Both models can handle extremely long documents and conversations, making them suitable for complex enterprise use cases.

When should I choose Claude Opus 4.8 over GPT-5.5?

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 when you need: (1) Maximum output quality for complex reasoning tasks, (2) Cost savings on output-heavy workloads (17% cheaper), (3) Anthropic's specific training advantages in nuanced analysis. For most premium use cases, Opus 4.8 offers better value per dollar.

Can I mix GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 to optimize costs?

Yes. Use GPT-5.5 for tasks requiring its slightly larger 1.05M context window, and route output-heavy reasoning tasks to Claude Opus 4.8 (17% cheaper output). This multi-model strategy can save 10-20% while maintaining premium quality.

Related Comparisons

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5
Premium tier reverse comparison
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
Premium vs mid-tier
GPT-5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8
Latest flagship comparison
Share on X LinkedIn